Skip to content
Fretline

Head to head

Ibanez PJ50E Performance Series vs Yamaha FS800J

The short answer is that the scale lengths are not the same (25.5" against 25"). Below, every specification we hold for both instruments is lined up, with the 18 rows that actually differ marked out.

Ibanez
Ibanez PJ50E jumbo acoustic-electric in Open-Pore Vintage Amber Sunburst, front view

PJ50E Performance Series

Open-Pore Vintage Amber Sunburst

A jumbo body and a working preamp, at a price where you usually get neither

6.8/105.0 (1)
Yamaha
Yamaha FS800J concert-body acoustic guitar in Natural, front view

FS800J

Natural, Concert

The FG800J in the smaller body, and the easier guitar to actually hold

8.0/104.3 (25)

As an Amazon Associate we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through our links, at no additional cost to you. We do not publish prices, because Amazon prices change constantly and a stale figure helps nobody. Follow the link for the current price and availability.

Score profile

Six editorial axes, overlaid. Where one shape sits outside the other, that is where the instrument gains ground.

  • Ibanez PJ50E Performance Series6.8
  • Yamaha FS800J8.0

Scores are Fretline editorial ratings on a 1-10 scale. They are our own assessment and are not supplied or endorsed by Amazon or by any manufacturer.

Specification by specification

Ibanez PJ50E Performance Series compared with Yamaha FS800J
PJ50E Performance SeriesFS800J
BrandIbanezYamaha
ModelPJ50E Performance SeriesFS800J
FinishOpen-Pore Vintage Amber SunburstNatural, Concert
InstrumentAcoustic guitarAcoustic guitar
Fretline score6.8 / 108.0 / 10
Value for money8 / 1010 / 10
Amazon rating5.0 / 5 (1)4.3 / 5 (25)
PriceUnder $300Under $300
TypeAcoustic-electric guitarAcoustic guitar
BodyJumboConcert
Body woodMerantiSolid spruce top with nato/mahogany back and sides
TopLaminated spruceSolid spruce
Back & sidesLaminated merantiNato / mahogany
Bracing—Scalloped bracing
Neck jointSet neck, joining at the 14th fretSet neck
Neck woodMerantiLocally sourced tonewood
Scale length25.5" (648 mm)25" (634 mm)
FingerboardNandu, boundRosewood
Radius—15 3/4" (400 mm)
Frets20—
NutPlastic—
Nut width—1 11/16" (43 mm)
BridgeNandu, with black Ibanez Advantage bridge pinsRosewood
TunersChrome Ibanez—
ElectronicsUnder-saddle pickup with Ibanez AEQ-2T preamp, onboard tuner and 2-band EQNone
ControlsVolume, bass, treble, onboard tuner—
OrientationRight-handedRight-handed
Skill levelBeginner, IntermediateBeginner, Intermediate
StylesFolk, Country, Pop, Rock, Worship, BluesFolk, Pop, Blues, Country, Worship
In the box——

A marked row is one where the two differ. A highlighted cell is the stronger figure where one can be judged objectively. Empty cells are specifications the manufacturer does not publish — never estimates.

Which one should you buy?

Computed from the specifications and our editorial scores for these two instruments only. It is not a general ranking.

Best value

Yamaha FS800J

Highest editorial value-for-money score of the instruments compared.

Best build

Yamaha FS800J

Highest editorial build-quality score.

Best tone

Yamaha FS800J

Highest editorial tone score.

Most versatile

Ibanez PJ50E Performance Series

Highest editorial versatility score, backed by pickup layout and switching.

Most comfortable

Yamaha FS800J

Highest editorial comfort score: neck profile, radius and body ergonomics.

Best for beginners

Yamaha FS800J

Strongest overall score among the instruments we rate as beginner-friendly.

Best for rock

Ibanez PJ50E Performance Series

Strongest overall score among the instruments suited to rock.

Best for the studio

Yamaha FS800J

Build and tone scores combined, with credit for tuning-stability hardware that matters when tracking.

Scores are Fretline editorial ratings on a 1-10 scale. They are our own assessment and are not supplied or endorsed by Amazon or by any manufacturer.

Want a third opinion?

The comparator takes as many instruments as you like, not just two, and recomputes the whole table and every conclusion as you add them.

Other comparisons